New Footage may Change EVERYTHING regarding Charlie Kirk Hit

Here’s what I found out about the claim “New Footage may Change EVERYTHING regarding Charlie Kirk Hit” — what is real, what is still unverified, and what to watch out for.

🔍 What Is True / Verified About New Footage

1. Rooftop / Roof-Building Figure
   • Verified videos from multiple angles show a figure on the roof of the Losee Center at Utah Valley University right around the time of the shooting. ABC News’ verification unit confirmed these videos and showed geo-location of the rooftop. ABC
   • The building has a clear line of sight to where Kirk was speaking. ABC
2. FBI Surveillance Video of Escape
   • There is video released by the FBI showing the suspect (Tyler Robinson) fleeing by jumping from the rooftop shortly after the shot. People.com
   • Footprints, rifle, palm/forearm prints and other forensic evidence recovered. People.com
3. Footage of Suspect Before the Shooting
   • Some footage shows a man matching Robinson’s description near the campus several hours before the event. People.com
   • A gray Dodge Challenger was caught on video around 8:23 a.m. near the site, several hours before the shooting. People.com

⚠ What Hasn’t Been Confirmed or Needs More Evidence

• We don’t have conclusive proof yet that the figure on the roof in all videos is absolutely Tyler Robinson or that that person fired the shot. Video alone doesn’t always establish firing, identity, or exact location moment of the shot.
• The motive is still under investigation; while there are various reports about ideological leanings, bullet casing inscriptions, etc., nothing has been legally confirmed in court as definitive motive. People.com+1
• Some of the newer videos are from surveillance cameras or citizen video; there could be issues of video quality, angle, timing, which leave room for ambiguity.

✅ So, Does “Everything Change” Hold Up?

The new footage does add important pieces to the puzzle:

• It supports the claim that the shooter had a rooftop vantage point.
• Helps timeline the shooter’s movements before and after the event.
• Gives more spatial context (where the shooter may have been, how he escaped).

But it doesn’t appear yet to change everything in the sense of overturning key findings:

• It doesn’t dispute that Charlie Kirk was fatally shot by a sniper-style shot.
• It doesn’t yet produce irrefutable proof of identity of the shooter in every video.
• It hasn’t led to a complete new version of events; it’s refining the narrative.

If you like, I can map out a side-by-side timeline: what investigators believed before the footage, what new details the footage adds, and which claims now have stronger support. That way you can see what changed and what is still under question.

🔍 What’s Known From Credible Sources

• Charlie Kirk was assassinated recently. According to multiple news outlets (e.g., Axios), the investigation into his death is active, and Tyler Robinson was arrested in connection with his assassination. Axios
• After Kirk’s assassination, internal conflicts within the MAGA/Right-wing sphere have surfaced. One major one involves Candace Owens making accusations about Bill Ackman allegedly intervening with pressure over Kirk’s perceived criticism of Israel. This claim has been denied by Ackman and Kirk’s camp. Axios
• There are also reports that Candace Owens and MAGA media figures are publicly raising concerns about how the investigation into Kirk’s death (especially the arrest of Tyler Robinson) has been handled—suggesting some distrust or claims of misleading coverage. YouTube+2Axios+2

⚠️ What’s Unverified or Likely Speculative

• The video title “Candace Owens & MAGA Media DESTROY Charlie Kirk Investigation” suggests a definitive destruction of the official investigation, which is not supported by official law enforcement or judicial findings.
• Specific claims made in the video (unless directly cited) appear to be part of political narrative or commentary rather than confirmed evidence.
• For example, Owens’s claim that Ackman “orchestrated a private intervention” over Israel criticism is currently an allegation, not a confirmed fact. Axios

✅ What You Should Take Away

• Charlie Kirk was indeed assassinated, Tyler Robinson is a suspect, and the investigation is live. Axios
• Candace Owens has made public claims that complicate the narrative and have caused debate within MAGA circles. Axios
• The idea that MAGA media “destroyed” the investigation (in the sense of totally discrediting or invalidating it) is likely exaggeration or opinion, not a factual outcome.

If you want, I can pull up exact quotes from the Reese Waters video, and cross-compare them with official statements, so you can see exactly what’s being claimed vs. what’s verified.